Deets on 70 Lefferts, Wrecking Ball for #96
The LPCA had a meeting on Wednesday night that was attended by Christopher Morris, developer of the condo project at #70 Lefferts that would involve demolishing the historic structure below, and two of the architects working on the project. They described the building, took questions and showed a copy of the architectural plans. The plans…
The LPCA had a meeting on Wednesday night that was attended by Christopher Morris, developer of the condo project at #70 Lefferts that would involve demolishing the historic structure below, and two of the architects working on the project. They described the building, took questions and showed a copy of the architectural plans.
The plans they showed were for a 25-unit building, 5 stories topped with 2 side-by-side duplex penthouses, 65′ at the front, going up to 75′ at the back. Some architectural details copied from the existing house–arched windows, cornices, etc.–were visible on the façade, which they said would be finished in textured cement to give a brownstone appearance. Underground parking is planned for 16 cars, accessed via the existing driveway to the left of the house. They said they don’t intend to take down either of the large old plane trees in front of the property. Their estimated start date is September, to be finished in 12-18 months. The architects are Robert Biviano and Harry Cyrille of Apico Consultants, Inc.
Also at the meeting was Simeon Bankoff from the Historic Districts Council, who explained some of the laws governing city and federal landmark districts, and suggested that the group consider trying to get Lefferts Place included in the Clinton Hill Historic District or landmarked in its own right. He gave the impression that it’s doubtful (but not impossible) that this could save #70, but it may be worth pursuing in order to save other historic houses in the future. According to Mr. Morris, #96 (top photo) was bought by another developer and is slated for the same fate as #70.
Civil War-Era Gem Faces Wrecking Ball [Brownstoner] GMAP
I heard rumors that the LPC is considering an expansion of the Clinton Hill Historic District. Is there any truth to this matter? If so, are the streets in question the ones precisely in the Clinton Hill South Historic District? If so, couldn’t Lefferts Place national designation be relied upon to expedite LPC’s landmarks review process and perhaps save this two homes and protect the others? Did anyone ask Simeon Bankoff this question?
The only possible current limitation (beyond normal zoning issues) that could be placed on the current demolition plans for these buidlings would hinge on whether any federal monies have secured with respect to these properties. If so, then since they are both contributin buildings in the Clinton Hill South Historic District (on the National register of Historic Places), any changes to the house would require review and comment by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (www.achp.gov) (though I’m not sure what limitations that would impose on the owner, if any).
#96 is actually the oldest building ont he block, 1851 I think. I personally like #96 better and think it could be restored to a really elegant house.
I’m very sad to see either of them demolished (though I must say that I think #70 had a pretty cheap looking exterior renovation done, closing in the original porch etc.) #70 could be a real gem if someone actually fixed it up to what it used to look like, right now, it’s interesting but a bit tacky looking.
My question is why do they have to knock down a historic house to put up something new?
Is there any answer but greed?
There are empty lots, abandon buildings, and down right frugly buildings that can be found all around NYC. Until the stock of empty lots or abandon buildings has been exhausted, any historic building (or ones with potential historical designation) should be left alone. And if/when the empty lots and abandon buildings are gone, then start demolition with the frugly building first.
Does anyone know if there was any discussion about possibly moving the house? I know that is an expensive longshot, depending on where the house is moved to, but this is such a shame. That house was always the focal point of the block, and was always a pleasant surprise, no matter how often you came upon it.