wholefoodsrender62011.jpg
Following a public hearing last night about Whole Foods’ application for a variance to build a supermarket that’s much larger than zoning allows on its 3rd Street and 3rd Avenue property, members of Community Board 6’s landmarks/land use committee voted in favor of supporting the store’s plans. The vote followed a hearing in which a number of community members expressed reservations about the project, particularly Whole Foods’ traffic study, which many criticized as inadequate in scope. There were also concerns aired on environmental grounds, such as whether the construction of the supermarket could theoretically hinder the Gowanus Superfund cleanup. Members of the Whole Foods team gave presentations and answered questions about the proposal, saying the 56,000-square-foot building would have a greenhouse on its roof for growing produce that would be sold inside; a cafe and community meeting room on the second floor; and, outside, feature a waterfront walkway open to the public. A few community members said the walkway would be more of a public benefit if it was larger and more park-like, while others said the aesthetics shown in the rendering above were unappealing because of the small windows (one of the Whole Foods reps said the rendering, which was handed out at the hearing, was out-of-date, and that a newer design calls for much larger windows). The committee voted to approve the variance request conditionally, asking that Whole Foods conduct another traffic study a year. They also urged the store to consider closing at 10 p.m., rather than 11 p.m., as it does in Manhattan, and to implement some sort of shuttle service. A motion was also approved to request a letter from the EPA about whether the project could negatively impact the Superfund cleanup. The full community board will vote on the variance request next week.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. THAT’s what we’ve been waiting for all this time???

    Hhhh…

    I do like it in watercolor though…It makes it soft and cuddly like a cheap greeting card.

    Frankly, I wouldn’t mind if they planned in more greenways. Do they have to cap that whole property because of chemicals in the ground??? That’s an awful lot of paving in the rendition above!

  2. Benson,

    I still think I’m right:

    “Rather than construct the store below-grade as previously proposed, we now plan to build it above-grade, which will require a variance from the Board of Standards and Appeals due to the physical hardships associated with site development (there is a high water table and, as you know, environmental cleanup requirements on the property).”

    http://bstoner.wpengine.com/brownstoner/archives/2010/11/breaking_gowanu.php

  3. “All well and good, except they aren’t really doing much remediation. If I’m not mistaken, they’re just pouring a slab over the toxic mess and building on top of it.”

    Snarkie;

    I think you are mistaken. This project was held up for a couple of years to allow the state DEP to clean up the brownfield. Alot of stuff was hauled away.

  4. Also, I always love the renderings of half-empty parking lots. I’m sure that’s what the Fairway parking lot looked like in the renderings too.

    (I personally doubt it will have any impact on traffic at all… but I do agree with the several comments above that it is a shame that this is a car-oriented store with no street entrance.)

  5. > remediating and redeveloping an urban brownfield site

    All well and good, except they aren’t really doing much remediation. If I’m not mistaken, they’re just pouring a slab over the toxic mess and building on top of it.

  6. Just build the damned thing already!!

    This lot has been a scourge for years and this store will breath life into the neighborhood. Yes, even a little more traffic is good, it shows that people and life are back.

  7. “One could argue (and I’d be one of them) that remediating and redeveloping an urban brownfield site in close proximity to residential communities and public transit is a lot more sustainable than doing another suburban store on what used to be a woods or farm.”

    Hear, hear!! Well said.

    New York used to be a place that embraced such projects. It is worth recalling Flushing Meadows park sits on a former ash dump. It was developed into a park for the 1939 World’s Fair.

1 2 3