cord360smith.JPG
It is high time to demand concrete actions be taken to safeguard our neighborhood. CG CORD is calling for a BUILDING MORATORIUM effective immediately! In a remarkable show of grassroots derring-do, a group known as CORD has succeeded in getting thousands of Carroll Gardens residents to sign a petition demanding a moratorium on all new construction over 50 feet. The group’s accomplished this in a few short months by posting regular updates on community message boards; bringing its concerns to the fore of neighborhood meetings; sending out mass email updates (like the one quoted above); and rallying support so there are monuments to the CORD cause scattered throughout Carroll Gardens, most impressively at the Smith Street site where a developer intends to build a 70-foot building. But are the calls for a moratorium realistic, and is there any precedent for such an action? Not really, and no.

For starters, the Department of City Planning has already pledged to study Carroll Gardens with a mind to rezoning it. Even if there was the will within the department to consider a moratorium, such an effort would almost certainly drag out the rezoning process. Further, a building moratorium would require an environmental impact study followed by ULURP—basically the same things a rezoning would require, steps that can take a few years. The biggest difference—and hitch to CORD’s plan—is that there’s no precedent for a building moratorium. As far as anyone we’ve talked to could recall, there hasn’t been an instance of the city enacting a moratorium in recent memory, although there have been cases of communities calling for them (for example, on Staten Island).

Although it seems doubtful that a moratorium will come to pass, CORD’s done an impressive job of drawing attention to the fact that Carroll Gardens’ outdated, as-of-right zoning leaves the door open for developers to construct buildings that could disrupt the look and feel of the neighborhood. Councilman Bill de Blasio says he lobbied City Planning for two years to downzone Carroll Gardens but only got a commitment from the department to study downzoning this June, and he credits CORD’s activism with helping to change the department’s mind. Although he says that in an ideal world, “we could achieve a legal moratorium right now,” in the real world, “rezonings are the only way to achieve what the community is looking for.” The question now for CORD is whether it’s possible that a single-minded focus on a building moratorium could end up undermining their cause by sidetracking rezoning efforts. Because if that happens, no one wins—not CORD, not the city, and certainly not Carroll Gardens.
Calls for Reining in Development at Carroll Gardens Meeting [Brownstoner]
City Planning to Look at Carroll Gardens Downzoning [Brownstoner]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. DeBlasio is quoted last in the Courier as saying, “A moratorium is a very good idea. It’s a quicker version of downzoning”. The promised downzoning study mentioned in this post is only that: a study! A moratorium is a call for an immediate, temoporay halt to current construction over 50 feet while a plan is worked out in CG. There are hundreds of precedents for moratoria outside of the city in (New York State) and one wonders how come the residents here in the city have not yet challenged legally the fact that they are unable to have more of a say in the planning of their very own communities. It may come sooner than later, however, given the current climate and thinking.

  2. re: 2:48
    what type of logic is that? that’s the most vapid thing I’ve read in the last week. Obviously you have zero understanding of how expanding supply impacts sub-housing market… yes even luxury development.

  3. Wow…such hostility. I understand both sides of the argument here. The need for housing (preferably affordable) and the desire to preserve the neighborhood. If anyone seriously thinks that any of the new or proposed development will address the need for affordable housing….they are deluded. Instead we will have expensive apartment buildings and condos that destroy the character of the neighborhood. So without a re-zoning, no one wins.

  4. A real job? Nice. The next time you come to a parent-teacher conference in my classroom and thank me for the excellent work I’m doing with your kid, why don’t you say that right to my face?

1 2 3