whole-foods3rdstreet-02-2008.JPG
As has been suggested elsewhere, despite the fact that the DOB granted Whole Foods a permit to do underpinning work for its proposed store at 3rd Street and 3rd Avenue earlier in the month, the would-be Gowanus supermarket still faces some regulatory barriers. In addition to needing a full-on new building permit, the Department of Environmental Conservation still has to sign off on the job. As it turns out, the DEC is still reviewing Whole Foods’ application to build on a wetlands. According to Thomas V. Panzone, the department’s citizen participation specialist for our region, “Whole Foods has submitted an application for an Article 15 Protection of Waters Permit, a Water Quality Certification under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act , and an Article 25 Tidal Wetlands Permit.” English translation (best as we can tell!): Whole Foods must prove that the store’s location next to the canal won’t adversely affect the general public and that the supermarket won’t harm the canal by virtue of its existence next to the waterway. Panzone also says that once the DEC deems Whole Foods’ application complete it will “trigger established public participation processes,” a 30-day window for the public to comment on the store’s application that may include a public hearing. The DEC already held a public-review period about the grocer’s brownfield cleanup plan last January and approved Whole Foods’ remediation plan for the site. As it stands now, then, construction isn’t going to begin on the supermarket for some time, and it’s possible that concerns about the development’s environmental impact—which have repeatedly been raised by a local group called Friends & Residents of Greater Gowanus—will be taken into further consideration.
DOB Green Lights First Stage of Whole Foods Project [Brownstoner] GMAP DOB
Gowanus Whole Foods Still Faces a Few Hurdles [Gowanus Lounge]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. Isn’t the difference between the Loews and Whole Foods building that Loews is all above ground and Whole Foods wants to build under ground?
    And isn’t Whole Foods located where there once was a big mill pond? There is a picture at the Old Stone House showing people iceskating there.
    And people living uphill along 3, 4, 5 th Streets talk of all the underground streams they experience. Don’t these feed to the Whole Foods wetland’s area?
    Can you (brownstoner)do more of a research story for us on this.

  2. It’s not red-tape that is holding up Whole Foods. Whole Foods has tripped themselves up all along here. They set out to do what is not allowed under law and have been having a most difficult time twisting things to get approvals.
    One thing to be said for Whole Foods, at least as far as the public can see, they have not lied with their documents to get DOB approval–as others trying to build what the law doesn’t permit have and still are doing.
    As for the underpinning permits granted to Whole Foods by the DOB, such permits are given out only when the owner signs a waver that they understand that permits for foundation work, does in no way, presume that the DOB will ever grant construction permits the architectural plans under review.

  3. Drain the canal and fill it with cement. Then put a park on top like the highline. Simpler than trying to clean it up, and less stinky.

  4. If it is being called a 40 year process now, then that translates into 80-100+ years. Like the sad, sad saga of the 2nd Ave subway.

1 2