dumbo-proposed-zoning-03-2008.jpg
The Department of City Planning’s draft rezoning plan for Dumbo—which made its debut last week—seems like it’s come out of nowhere, but in fact it’s been in the works for nearly two years. Planning put the rezoning drive on hold while the LPC worked on making the area a historic district, and now that historic designation’s happened (pending Council approval), the city is once again gunning to rezone Dumbo. We spoke to Purnima Kapur, the director of City Planning’s Brooklyn Office, about the draft rezoning proposal. (Gowanus Lounge also chatted with Kapur yesterday; as GL notes, it seems clear that “the Department is pushing to explain its proposal.”) Takeaways:

Scope: The draft proposal encompasses a 12-block area generally bounded by John Street and the East River to the north, Bridge Street to the east, York Street to the south and Anchorage Place and the Manhattan Bridge to the west.

Mixed-Uses: The DCP proposal is mixed-use and concentrates bulk (R8A zoning) along Jay Street and works its way down in density as it reaches Vinegar Hill, which has lower-rise buildings.

Timeline: Planning is beginning its public outreach process. Once consensus is reached, environmental assessment can begin. We’re hoping to have certification by the fall, says Kapur, to begin ULURP.

About that Other Proposal: The Dumbo Neighborhood Association’s rezoning proposal, which was released last week and covers a much larger swath of the neighborhood than the city’s, took Planning by surprise, but Our proposal is not that different from theirs, says Kapur. One big difference is that DNA wants to have heavy manufacturing zoning mixed in with residential uses. We’ve concentrated on promoting an appropriate mix of complementary uses in an area where the underlying zoning is no longer reflective of the mix of existing land uses and where there were vacant or underutilized buildings, says Kapur. We did not include areas where there are active industrial or utility uses.

Why the Controversial Walentas Dock St. Site Isn’t Included: “The reason it’s not in our proposal is because it’s under single ownership and it is non-contiguous with our study area. In addition, because of proximity to the Brooklyn Bridge, it’ll require a site-specific review which cannot be achieved in an area-wide rezoning, says Kapur. The public will have an ample opportunity to examine and comment on the applicant’s proposal.
Post-Landmarking, Dumbo Rezoning Talk Begins [Brownstoner]
Brooklyn Planning Director Explains Dumbo Rezoning [GL]
DNA Throws Its Dumbo Rezoning Plan Into the Ring [Brownstoner]
Dock Street Protesters: 20% There on Signatures [Brownstoner]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. I agree!

    Get on with it already!

    ASAP make DUMBO as much like manhattan as is physically possible.

    All the people who moved to DUMBO to escape the manhattan lifestyle are missing out on the manhattan lifestyle!

    More residential building means MORE AWESOMENESS! (just look at williamsburg)

  2. Just get on with it already! More residential buildings means more businesses and services. It’s about time DUMBO got a real full service supermarket and some more noteworthy restaurants and shops.

  3. I think 9:50 was quoting from others’ comments, not making his/her own. That said, I have to agree with 10:35 – what’s the point of this?

    As for the rezoning – does this mean Guttman gets to convert his carbuncle? And the burned site? Must make all the other owners who played by the rules happy.

  4. 9:50 seems to think there is illegal racial discrimination in the affordable housing racket.

    He would be wrong.

    He doesn’t like the Verizon Building. Yeah, I don’t like it either (can’t see why its relevant)

    He doesn’t quite understand that it is not unheard for public schools to occupy community facility space within other buildings. The “developer” doesn’t own the school. At worst, the owner leases the space to the school and sometimes sells it as a condo. The developer will do whatever really, it’s up to the user. In general, a lot of governments are getting out of the real estate business.

    The problem with democracy is people typically vote to put the public coffers in their pocket rather than in capital maintenance. This is why the subway systems, parks, and public facilities typically are crumbling or only get by due to charity (ie prospect park). With a long term lease, the city HAS to pay and the landlord is responsible for all maintenance.

    Some states, like Maine, are moving all government offices into leased properties.

  5. Didn’t much know about the Dock St Site controversy until I saw it listed above (as, strangely, excluded; the rationale didn’t really sound very watertight either, they gave THREE separate reasons — why not ten or twelve?). So I looked back at the posts from december, and boy did people get riled up about it. This is one of my favorites.

    “Glad to see the TT PR team is awake this AM. Free Dock Street T-shirt to the employee who posts the most comments!

    Affordable housing? See how well that’s going over on Court Street if you’re black.

    Nice tall buildings in Manhattan next to the bridge? Yeah, that Verizon building rocks, glad it’s there.

    Badly needed middle school? Since when do we sell our public services to developers. If so, I would at least like to see a Halliburton bid for the school and get a little auction going.
    Posted by: guest at December 7, 2007 11:11 AM”