ellimanq1marketreport42011.jpg
Time to have fun with numbers! Lots of ’em, as the first-quarter market reports for Brooklyn are upon us. So what do they tell us about 2011 thus far? Depends on which one you look at, though the general consensus is that Brooklyn’s market is markedly stronger than it was at this time last year in terms of sales volume, and condos are doing brisker business. Here’s what they’re saying:

Elliman: As shown in the chart above, Elliman’s report (posted here at some point today), which is prepared by Miller Samuel, isn’t recording big shifts in median sales prices compared to Q1 2010 or last quarter. However, there was a decent uptick in sales volume, from 1,861 property sales last year to 2,373 in the same quarter this year. The big story in Elliman’s report is that condo sales were way up year-over-year, from 573 to 923. While all property types showed increases in sales volume, though, median prices were only down on one- to three-families: From $540,000 in Q1 2010 to $520,000 this quarter.

Corcoran: The Big C’s report [PDF] is aided and abetted by the folks at PropertyShark. Here’s part of the synopsis: “Market wide sales were up 25% from both last quarter and a year ago, driven by a boost of transactions in new development properties across the borough. New development market share in First Quarter 2011 was 44%, up from 41% last quarter and 35% from First Quarter 2010. Market wide, the median price of a Brooklyn apartment was $430,000, an increase of 6% from last quarter and relatively unchanged from one year ago…Single-family townhouse sales were 4% higher in median price than last quarter but were 3% lower than a year ago.”

REBNY: Crain’s has the rundown on the Real Estate Board of New York’s first quarter tallies, in which Kings fares comparatively well: “Brooklyn was the only borough in the city where the number of home sales did not dip. There were nearly 2,281 total home sales in the first quarter, up 1% from the same time last year.”


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. I had posted this on the “Contract crazy” thread:
    “These are the sales numbers from Miller-Samuels for the 1-3 family segment in Brooklyn (prepared for Douglas Elliman):
    2009 2010 2011
    Q1 606 879 ??
    Q2 716 939
    Q3 944 937
    Q4 937 715

    The last known quarter (Q4-2010) actually shows a decline in the number of sales AND a decline in price (only about 1%) AND a decline in number of days on the market. So it looks like whatever is selling, is selling fast, at flattish prices from last year, but less houses are sold overall.”

    Updated today:
    2009 2010 2011
    Q1 606 879 984
    Q2 716 939
    Q3 944 937
    Q4 937 715

    The median price is flat against last quarter, down 3.7% against last year’s first quarter, but the volume is highest since 2008, and we’re looking at a spectacular average of 57 days on the market (from 106 for the 1st quarter of 2010.)

  2. screw being in the market, the sidelines is where all the fun is at anyway! if there’s a major catastrophe those on the sidelines can just blissfully exit, unscathed and laughing. do you have pretty clown shoes tho!

    *rob*

  3. pricing varies, and the stats suck IMO
    velocity is what counts
    people don’t really play clown with that level of bucks and their families,,,, they need places to live! that is why they buy!

    and they are IN THE MARKET not on the sidelines go to some open houses and talk to buyers and get back to us……

  4. quote:
    Price per square foot was $288 vs. $276 in the prior quarter and $271 a year ago.

    irrelevant data considered the prices of everything else like food and gas and shit increased in prices of multiples many times that of housing. dollars are worthless and it seems like people with money are just playing clown these days.

    *rob*

  5. In the 1-3 Family Market, Price per square foot was $288 vs. $276 in the prior quarter and $271 a year ago. Days on market were 57!!!! Compared to 119 the previous quarter and 106 a year ago.