Walkabout with Montrose: Lux Living: Apartment Hotels
This is the 4th in a series about the history of multi-unit housing in Brooklyn. As more and more people poured into New York in the last quarter of the 19th century, it soon became apparent that the city was running out of room for everyone, rich and poor alike. Of course, the rich had…
This is the 4th in a series about the history of multi-unit housing in Brooklyn.
As more and more people poured into New York in the last quarter of the 19th century, it soon became apparent that the city was running out of room for everyone, rich and poor alike.
Of course, the rich had more options. Advances in transportation- the Brooklyn Bridge, ferries, railroads, horse trolley service, and the improvements of local streets and roads made Brooklyn an ideal suburb for many of the era’s successful industrialists, financiers, and movers and shakers.
Brooklyn Heights had long been the first suburb, with larger and finer brownstone homes replacing most of the clapboards of the late 1700’s.
Clinton Hill, Bedford, St. Mark’s, and Park Slope soon became home to millionaires who built large and lavish mansions and occupied wide and opulent row houses.
Luxury apartment buildings and hotels were the next step in providing homes to the well off in Brooklyn.
Over in Manhattan, the first luxury apartment buildings started springing up in the 1870’s, with luxury co-ops, including the Gramercy Park Apartments, in 1883, the next step in living around one’s social peers.
The apartment hotel was developed at this time to provide the privacy of a house with the amenities of a hotel for the discerning tenant. One entered into a lavish and ornate lobby, and was conveyed to suites by that new invention, the passenger elevator.
The suites were large, many consisting of a reception room, parlors, a dining room, bedrooms, private baths, and servant’s rooms. There were no kitchens, but some suites had butler’s pantries to aid in the serving of meals.
Residents had a choice of dining in the opulent private dining rooms downstairs, or having meals brought up with the aid of dumbwaiters, connected to the kitchens in the basement of the building. Dishes would be removed in the same way.
Maid and laundry service could also be provided, with wash tubs and drying rooms also in the basement.
New technologies made apartment hotels and luxury apartment buildings the laboratories for inventions we now take for granted: telephones and hotel switchboards were in use by the end of the 1870’s, as were central heating, hot running water and gas lighting.
Electricity was in place by the 1890’s, while the central vacuum cleaner, with nozzles in the walls of each room, was invented as far back as 1859, with suction powered by electricity commonplace by the turn of the century.
The Hotel St. George, on Henry and Clark Streets in Brooklyn Heights, begun in 1885, was one of the earliest upper class apartment hotels in Brooklyn.
An 1888 advertisement reads, The independence of the home maintained in every respect without the annoyance of housekeeping: experts in charge of every department, making the St. George the leading family hotel.
The hotel expanded into the largest hotel in New York City, eventually taking up the entire block of Clark to Pineapple, Hicks to Henry. Montrose Morris designed one of the additions in 1890.
Other apartment hotels followed, among them the Italian Renaissance Revival styled Bossert Hotel (1909), on Montague St, with its ornate lobby, and later famous rooftop dining room, and the Standish Arms Hotel on Hicks (1903).
Montrose Morris designed the San Carlos Hotel, now the Roanoke Apartments, in Fort Greene (1890), and the Chatelaine Hotel in Grant Square, Crown Heights North. Clinton Hill’s Mohawk Hotel, built on Washington Ave, in 1903-4 by the firm Neville and Bagge, was among the finest in Brooklyn.
The Mohawk offered suites of 1 to 5 rooms, with a grand dining room on the ground floor. The Beaux-Arts hotel was described as having the quiet atmosphere of a well-ordered home with all of the advantages of a modern hotel.
The lines sometimes get blurry between guest hotels and apartment hotels, some buildings were both, and many of the finest in Manhattan and Bklyn have always been both.
All of the examples in Brooklyn have now been converted into apartments for a wide range of incomes, with the exception of the Bossert, which belongs to the Jehovah’s Witnesses, and is on the market. See photos on Flickr.
There were many other smaller hotels in our well to do brownstone neighborhoods, some catering to bachelors, working women, middle-class families, and those coming to the city needing a base of operations.
All of this non-traditional living, that is, non-single family home living, was bound to raise the eyebrows and the ire of the watchers of morality, and as can be expected, they were not pleased.
A writer in the Architectural Journal of 1903 opined that the promiscuous exclusivity of the apartment hotel made it the most dangerous enemy domesticity has had to encounter. Large numbers of working single women were a new force in the working environment beginning in the last quarter of the 19th century.
Bachelor hotels for men often consisted of a suite of 2 or more rooms, but women’s residential hotels had only private rooms, like a dormitory, forcing all entertainment and dining to public spaces, where they could be watched over.
It was only in the beginning of the 20th century that public opinion would allow young single women to rent apartments.
Still, many social critics saw these new independent living arrangements, combined with the disappearing servant class and modern domestic inventions and conveniences, as a witch’s brew designed to corrupt women and break up families.
They blamed the apartment for the rising divorce rate, declining birth rate, premarital sex, and social disparities between rich and poor. (from Building the Dream: A social history of housing in America, by Gwendolyn Wright).
Yet, for many of the well to do, at the close of the 19th century, the apartment was an important force in housing in wealthier neighborhoods. Brooklyn is home to some fine examples, as we’ll explore next time.
Next time: Together, but not too much: the luxury apartment building.
[Photos via eBay]
Nice work.
Just a couple of corrections: except for the homes of the original estate owners, the earliest houses developed on Brooklyn Heights weren’t built until the early 1800s (not late 1700s). Also, the Standish Arms is on Columbia Heights (not Hicks).
Good going, Montrose. Your series is a real contribution to Brooklyn scholarship. When the publishers come calling, your material will be all ready. The Brooklyn section in Barnes & Noble is only getting bigger…
I remember when the St. George Hotel had bronze Art Deco plaques (gazelles, men, women, sunbursts, etc.) in the lobby. They were stolen, and later turned up for sale at some antique show. This was back in the ’70s. I regret not being even older, so I could have swum in the original pool.
When I was there in ’96 it was part SRO, part student housing. Not sure what it became after. The subway access couldn’t be beat. Unfortunately, that didn’t make up for the conditions we were living in at the time.
I have always loved the Hotel St. George. it originally had the world’s largest indoor saltwater swimming pool, and I’m told the US olympic swim team practiced there. When my dad was a young man the St George was considered quite the destination place, with a rooftop terrace and ballroom. It subsequently fell on hard times, and when I moved to Brooklyn Heights in 1981, parts of it were abandoned and one building, the one with the entrance on Henry St., was a nasty SRO (I think it is now the student housing referenced above — an SRO of a different sort). 111 Hicks St., the St. George Towers building, was converted to co-ops about that time. Half of the pool was cemented over, but the rest remains and is part of the health club there (it was an Easter Athletic, but I don’t know if it still is). The studio building, in Pineapple St., I believe has been converted into condos. And the Clark St 2/3 stop is below the building and you take an elevator into the hotel (although the lobby is separate).
Interesting and informative as always. As for differences between men and women, in the 1970s my aunt who was an executive could rent an apt but not get a credit card except for sears.
If I recall St George burnt down becasue someone was using a blowtorch to steal copper piping. Many apts in the coop there were ruined as well.
The center building in the St George photo burned down about fifteen years ago. It was a huge fire that badly damaged the adjacent Montrosse Morris building as well. Both had been long vacant. Fortunately the landmarks commisssion held out for the restoration of the Morris building and the results are very good. Today it is a dormitory building housing students from Brooklyn and Manhattan colleges. It is really a new building with an old facade. But it works. I particularly admire the large bronze ionic columns at the entrance, under the marquee, of the Morris building.
Petebklyn:
Apartment houses weren’t always welcomed by the neighbors when they first appeared.
Fifth Avenue denizens attempted to restrict their street by covenant to “first-class” single-family houses and then, when that failed, to limit the height of buildings to six floors, thinking that would discourage the big apartment houses.
By the 20’s, the courts overturned these limits and the big Candella and Roth buildings changed Central Park’s eastern skyline.
NOP
Thanks Montrose. The section on the social context of the buildings is especially interesting.
can you imagine the uproar if something so radical and out-of-context was to be built in our neighborhoods today.