"Easy Housekeeping": How Early-20th-Century Brokers Made Modest Homes Seem Desirable
Was your house advertised to you as an “easy housekeeping home”? Probably not, as such a characteristic is now dated in more ways than one, but there was a time in the early 20th century when the phrase was a relatively common broker term used to market certain properties.
Was your house advertised to you as an “easy housekeeping home”? Probably not, as such a characteristic is now dated in more ways than one, but there was a time in the early 20th century when the phrase was a relatively common broker term used to market certain properties.
An “easy houskeeping home” is one that “is so designed that the owner can have all the comforts of an entire house without needing a servant,” reads a 1911 advertisement in the New-York Tribune for one such property on Prospect Park East. (A two-story with parquet floors and hardwood trim, the property was selling for $7,950 to $8,500.)
In truth, the “easy housekeeping-home” label seems to have been a marketing tactic for making smaller homes seem more desirable.
Recently, Brownstoner readers living in a home on Union Street between Rogers and Nostrand in Crown Heights South did a little research on their property and, with the help of Brownstone Detectives, discovered their home had one been marketed as an “easy housekeeping home.”
“It’s worth noting that the modern income tax was passed in 1913,” the reader and easy-houskeeping dweller noted in an email to Brownstoner, drawing a potential connection between the tax passing and families downsizing to more manageable homes that didn’t require outside help.
Related Stories
Moving Day: Why Old-Timey Brooklynites Dreaded May 1, and Why Real Estate Mavens Studied It
120 Years of the Brooklyn Navy Yard’s Medieval-Style Sands Street Entrance [Photos]
Brooklyn’s Forgotten Electoral Districts: The Lost History of the Ward System
Email tips@brownstoner.com with further comments, questions or tips. Follow Brownstoner on Twitter and Instagram, and like us on Facebook.
What's Your Take? Leave a Comment