Calls for Reining in Development at Carroll Gardens Meeting
Three plans for preserving Carroll Gardens’ character were on the table last night at the Scotto Funeral Home on 1st Place. Councilman Bill de Blasio hosted a town hall meeting that drew an overflow crowd of about 150 residents, most responding to the controversy surrounding the planned 70-foot development at 360 Smith Street. Proposals for…
Three plans for preserving Carroll Gardens’ character were on the table last night at the Scotto Funeral Home on 1st Place. Councilman Bill de Blasio hosted a town hall meeting that drew an overflow crowd of about 150 residents, most responding to the controversy surrounding the planned 70-foot development at 360 Smith Street. Proposals for Carroll Gardens—a neighborhood that’s apparently unafraid of a few new rules and regulations—include downzoning, landmarking, and a moratorium on construction over 50 feet. In light of community concerns, de Blasio said City Planning has committed to studying most of the area west of Bond Street for downzoning. After being pressed by a member of CORD (Carroll Gardens Organization to Respectfully Develop), which organized a petition calling for a moratorium on new buildings over 50 feet, de Blasio said he would also look into putting a moratorium in place while downzoning was in the works. Bob Furman, the president of the 4-borough Neighborhood Alliance, completed the preservation triple-play by speaking about approaching the Landmarks Preservation Commission in order to designate the entire neighborhood a historic district. Although all three proposals will clearly require a lengthy gestation period with the city, CORD’s push for a building moratorium was obviously a crowd favorite. It’s unclear to us what the legal basis and process for implementing a building moratorium are. Is there any precedent for such a move?
Aside from chewing on questions of height limitations, residents repeatedly brought up the pending rezoning of Gowanus and plans for the redevelopment of the Public Place site. Attendees voiced concerns about the possibility that high-rises will be built on the Public Place site as well as the timeline for cleaning up toxic sites along the canal. Beyond that, several community members said the neighborhood’s infrastructure wouldn’t be able to support the influx of new people that could result from allowing increased density as part of the Gowanus rezoning. While no concrete resolutions came out of the evening, de Blasio said the meeting was the first in a series that would deal with development issues in Carroll Gardens. Check out more coverage on Gowanus Lounge, First & Court, and Curbed.
Why was the meeting at American Girl Place?
The area around Atlantic Ave and Court is a dump. It’s not like that strip has any character or historical quality. I personally wouldnt have a problem with a slightly taller buildings just on Atlantic if it’d prompt developers to rip down some of the crap that’s there now (I nominate Keyfood for teardown).
We almost went to the meeting last night — but figured that no one needed a screaming toddler voicing his concerns. We did sign various petitions though and feel that huge buildings will have repercussions for Carroll Gardens.
1) Tall buildings will block views and change the look/feel of the area.
2) An influx of new people will increase the class sizes at PS 29 and PS 58 (because presumably they’ll be more kids)
3) Huge construction is a pain to deal with – dust, trucks, debris, etc.
I wrote about Columbia Street Waterfront and development in July — and I agree with one of the other responders that additional development there is also not appreciated. (Check out: http://andamom.com/?p=120)
– Andamom
Strange that deBlasio would consider extension of the LH1 District currently covering much of Brooklyn Heights and Cobble Hill while simultaneously supporting Two Trees’ Atlantic/Court application to undermine the very same. Can’t imagine he’s much of a champion for contextual zoning OR landmark districts based on his blindness at that particular corner of Brooklyn.
Don’t even think about dumping your 10 story problems on Carrol Gardens West, Columbia Street Waterfront district. Everytime Cobble Hill/Carrol Gardens doesn’t want something they try to dump it on the other side of the BQE. Well those days are over.
why 50ft limit? Isn’t it more important to limit what is seen from the street. I have a landmark brownstone & any extension i do can’t be visible from the st anyway. That said, if i were to put a room on my roof, set back sufficiently/done in a way to satisfy landmarks, it would probably still somewhat exceed 50ft in height. Who am i hurting by doing this? What is wrong with my adding space/value to my home in this way?
These meeting have outgrown the funeral home room anyway. Although the setting is totally odd and eccentric. Although a bit creepy, it beats a generic meeting room.
Note to self:
Write explicit instructions to next of kin to not have funeral at Scotto’s. If I have to lie in wake in that room, I will come back and haunt them till the end of time.
One key difference between a commercial (e.g.: the aforementioned chain pharmacy or the “Arena” bagel shop) and a residential building: the neighborhood cannot boycott a residential building.
btw, love the photo–is the councilman delivering a eulogy?