126-4th-Avenue-Screed-0510.jpg
Someone’s mad as hell about the crappy architecture on Fourth Avenue and they’re not going to take it! Remember the craptactular rental building that went up at 126 4th Avenue a couple of years ago? Someone with the moniker “The Ghost of Vitruvius” posted the above screed on the side of the building recently, and a tipster sent it in over the weekend. The text says “ARCHITECT: Is this really the best you can do? This building is UGLY, and therefore IRRESPONSIBLE” and a logo in the corner reads “NYC Building Aesthetics.” Has anyone spotted more of these around town? GMAP


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I think the sign and the views expressed are great. Right on the mark. This building, and too many others, constitute visual pollution. Especially troubling since there is such beauty to be achieved as evidenced by the past all around us in fair Brooklyn.

  2. Here is a bit from the AIA’s 2007 Code of Conduct – see http://bit.ly/bmjOwR :

    “E.S. 1.2 Standards of Excellence:
    Members should continually
    seek to raise the standards of
    aesthetic excellence, architectural
    education, research,
    training, and practice.

    “E.S. 1.3 Natural and Cultural Heritage:
    Members should respect and
    help conserve their natural and
    cultural heritage while striving to
    improve the environment and the
    quality of life within it.”

    I would love to see the AIA stand up to their own words.

  3. As an owner on 4th, this building was good for business. On the other hand, tiny windows: wasted opportunity to take in the sky and natural light. Street level wall of stone: wasted opportunity to add valuable street life.

    These buildings fail to create lasting value. To me, that’s a shame.

  4. i think it’s pretty funny, though agree that it could use a little levity/satire to make the same point.

    That said, i agree with architect66 that this commentary is barking up the wrong tree – if you’re going to shame someone, call out the developer. In this kind of economically driven development, i’d be surprised if the architect had very much control over the results.

1 2 3 4